A correspondent has questions about how I deal with g in conceptual physics:
I notice that you intentionally use g as 10 N/kg instead of m/s/s and say that weight is the force of a planet. I've noticed that when we get to energy, students struggle with g for GPE=mgh. They all want to put the mass (say 0.5 kg) but then they say 5N or 5N/kg for g. It seems they have a very shallow understanding of what we're doing with 10 N/kg (and I notice you don't tell them explicitly to do mg for weight). And the other thing they do is anytime they see a mass in kg, they'll "convert it to newtons." Or they'll see a force of 5 N and say it equals 0.5 kg.
Do you care whether they make the connection between "objects in free fall gain/lose 10m/s/s" and the gravitational field? For instance: when they're solving for speed based on KE, when N/kg doesn't fit with the other units. Or do you not really care about manipulating units, as long as they know what units go to what quantities (i.e. speed is always m/s, energy is always J).
In conceptual, I don't care at all if they use careful language about g. I never explicitly make the connection between the 10 m/s/s free fall acceleration and the 10 N/kg gravitational field. They do need to put correct units on, of course... but I am fine with them "converting" 5 kg to 50 N. As long as they sort of can get the correct values for weight and mass, I'm fine. No unit manipulation ever.
If they can do a calculation with mgh in a table, indicating correct units on m, g, and h, with J on the final answer, this is fantastic (and difficult for conceptual students). At this point if they plug in numbers correctly in a table and get a unit wrong here and there, as long as the final units are right, I'm fine.
What about in AP Physics? I still start out not caring much about the true meaning of g... still no unit manipulation. They do eventually need to understand that free fall g is the same as gravitational field g, because the AP exam discusses the difference between gravitational and inertial mass. Yet, I don't even mention that difference or the connection until after spring break. I'm far more concerned with their articulation of correct annotated energy bar charts; and with the conceptual difference between mass and weight. (In AP, I do encourage students to write mg for the force of the earth on an object.)
You're right that student understanding of 10 N/kg is often quite shallow. Usually they get it more as the year goes on; sometimes they don't truly "get it." But if they can make proper energy bar carts and make correct qualitative and quantitative predictions with energy bar charts, then understanding the meaning of g can be left for a future class - or might never happen.
No comments:
Post a Comment